Projected score: Tunisia 1 - 2.9 Netherlands
This Group F encounter pits a Netherlands side favored to progress heavily against a Tunisia team seeking to upset the odds. The model assigns the Dutch a 62.1% win probability with a projected scoreline of 3.0–1.2, suggesting Ronald Koeman's squad will control large stretches while Tunisia hunts for chances on the counter. The 28.3% draw probability reflects Tunisia's defensive organization under Sabri Lamouchi, though the 9.6% upset win likelihood underscores how decisively the model expects the Dutch to dominate.
The Netherlands will likely operate in a 4-3-3 shape, with Virgil van Dijk and Nathan Aké anchoring a backline supported by Denzel Dumfries's width on the flank. Frenkie de Jong and Marten de Roon should control the midfield tempo, with Tijjani Reijnders offering pressing intensity, while Memphis Depay and Cody Gakpo stretch Tunisia's defense on the wings. Tunisia will compact into a defensive mid-block, relying on Ellyes Skhiri's presence and Montassar Talbi's positioning to block central avenues; Hannibal Mejbri may dart forward to disrupt Dutch buildup. Set pieces will be critical for Tunisia—both defensive (where Dylan Bronn's aerial presence matters) and offensive (where late deliveries could create aerial chaos). The Dutch superiority in possession and transition speed should create overlaps that expose the width of Tunisia's defensive setup.
For the Netherlands, Memphis Depay's movement in the final third and ability to drift into pockets will test Tunisia's midfield discipline; his experience in knockout scenarios makes him a focal point for buildup play. Frenkie de Jong orchestrates possession and rhythm—his press resistance and ability to thread through-passes will determine how often Tunisia are pinned back. For Tunisia, Ellyes Skhiri's leadership and positioning in midfield will be vital to screening the defense and triggering quick transitions; the captain's work rate directly impacts whether Tunisia can compress space. Hannibal Mejbri offers creative thrust from midfield, and his willingness to press high could disrupt the Dutch rhythm in moments, while Aymen Dahmen's distribution from the back will need precision to avoid turnovers in dangerous areas.
| 2026-03-31 | A | Canada | 0-0 | D |
| 2026-03-28 | H | 1-0 | W | |
| 2026-01-03 | A | 1-1 | D | |
| 2025-12-30 | A | 1-1 | D | |
| 2025-12-27 | A | 2-3 | L | |
| 2025-12-23 | H | 3-1 | W | |
| 2025-12-18 | H | 2-1 | W | |
| 2025-12-07 | A | 3-0 | W | |
| 2025-12-04 | A | 2-2 | D | |
| 2025-12-01 | A | 0-1 | L |
| 2026-03-31 | H | Ecuador | 1-1 | D |
| 2026-03-27 | H | Norway | 2-1 | W |
| 2025-11-17 | H | 4-0 | W | |
| 2025-11-14 | A | Poland | 1-1 | D |
| 2025-10-12 | H | 4-0 | W | |
| 2025-10-09 | A | 4-0 | W | |
| 2025-09-07 | A | 3-2 | W | |
| 2025-09-04 | H | Poland | 1-1 | D |
| 2025-06-10 | H | 8-0 | W | |
| 2025-06-07 | A | 2-0 | W |
| 2009-02-11 | Tunisia | 1-1 | Netherlands | Draw | friendly |
| 1994-01-19 | Tunisia | 2-2 | Netherlands | Draw | friendly |
| 1978-04-05 | Tunisia | 0-4 | Netherlands | Netherlands | friendly |
We frame edges as where our model disagrees with the consensus public price. No bet sizes, no recommendations — just the spots worth a second look on your own sheet.
Probability estimates only. We publish where our model and the public market disagree — that's it. No recommendations, no bet sizes.
| Outcome | Our model | Market implied | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | 11.9% | 14.6% | -2.7pp |
| Draw | 10.9% | 22.2% | -11.3pp |
| Netherlands | 77.2% | 63.2% | +14.0pp |