Projected score: Sweden 1.31 - 1 Tunisia
Sweden enters as clear favorites with a 43.3% win probability, and the projected scoreline of 1.4–1.1 suggests a competitive but ultimately Swedish-controlled affair. Tunisia arrives as underdogs at 26.9%, but the near-30% draw probability hints at a match where tactical discipline and set-piece execution could prove decisive. Graham Potter's side has the quality to impose their structure, yet Sabri Lamouchi's defensive organization may keep this tighter than the headline numbers suggest.
Sweden will likely deploy a possession-based approach, looking to control tempo through their midfield trio and shift play wide to exploit space. Alexander Isak and Viktor Gyökeres offer different profiles in attack—one favoring movement and intelligence, the other physicality—and both should benefit from service down the flanks via Gabriel Gudmundsson and the wide contributors. Tunisia's defensive shape under Lamouchi will prioritize compactness, with Ellyes Skhiri anchoring the midfield and Dylan Bronn and Montassar Talbi forming a resolute central-defensive partnership. Expect Tunisia to sit deeper, inviting Swedish pressure while targeting transitions through Hannibal Mejbri's creativity; set-piece moments—whether defending or attacking—may represent Tunisia's clearest path to scoring. Sweden's pressing intensity will be crucial; if they suffocate Tunisia's build-up play early, the volume of chances should mount. Conversely, if Tunisia can absorb pressure and stay organized, their compactness could frustrate Potter's team and create dangerous counterattacking moments.
Alexander Isak carries Sweden's creative and finishing burden; his movement in the box and ability to link play will be essential to unlocking Tunisia's defense. Mattias Svanberg's ball-retention and positioning in midfield will dictate Sweden's rhythm—how he manages Skhiri's pressing and Mejbri's energy will shape the flow of the match. For Tunisia, Ellyes Skhiri's discipline and work rate in midfield are the heartbeat of their defensive structure; limiting his influence through early pressure is key to Swedish dominance. Hannibal Mejbri represents Tunisia's primary creative outlet and press-resistance, so his positioning and decision-making will determine whether Tunisia can generate genuine transition opportunities. Finally, Gabriel Gudmundsson's attacking contributions down the left flank should provide width against Tunisia's compact shape, making his crossing and dribbling potential a critical element of Sweden's attacking plan.
| 2026-03-31 | H | Poland | 3-2 | W |
| 2026-03-26 | H | 3-1 | W | |
| 2025-11-18 | H | 1-1 | D | |
| 2025-11-15 | A | 1-4 | L | |
| 2025-10-13 | H | South Korea | 0-1 | L |
| 2025-10-10 | H | 0-2 | L | |
| 2025-09-08 | A | South Korea | 0-2 | L |
| 2025-09-05 | A | 2-2 | D | |
| 2025-06-10 | H | 4-3 | W | |
| 2025-06-06 | A | 2-0 | W |
| 2026-03-31 | A | Canada | 0-0 | D |
| 2026-03-28 | H | 1-0 | W | |
| 2026-01-03 | A | 1-1 | D | |
| 2025-12-30 | A | 1-1 | D | |
| 2025-12-27 | A | 2-3 | L | |
| 2025-12-23 | H | 3-1 | W | |
| 2025-12-18 | H | 2-1 | W | |
| 2025-12-07 | A | 3-0 | W | |
| 2025-12-04 | A | 2-2 | D | |
| 2025-12-01 | A | 0-1 | L |
| 2003-02-12 | Tunisia | 1-0 | Sweden | Tunisia | friendly |
| 1999-02-10 | Tunisia | 0-1 | Sweden | Sweden | friendly |
| 1992-04-22 | Tunisia | 0-1 | Sweden | Sweden | friendly |
| 1976-02-28 | Tunisia | 1-1 | Sweden | Draw | friendly |
We frame edges as where our model disagrees with the consensus public price. No bet sizes, no recommendations — just the spots worth a second look on your own sheet.
Probability estimates only. We publish where our model and the public market disagree — that's it. No recommendations, no bet sizes.
| Outcome | Our model | Market implied | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 48.2% | 49.5% | -1.3pp |
| Draw | 21.8% | 28.0% | -6.1pp |
| Tunisia | 29.9% | 22.5% | +7.4pp |